What is the biggest challenge in BIM

What is the biggest challenge in BIM? Asking experts

BIM Corner team has written already hundreds of pages about the pros, examples and tutorials on how to succeed in using the BIM processes. However, we are aware that BIM doesn’t come as smoothly as we would like it to come. Hence the question in the title – What are the biggest challenges in BIM?

All of our six work long enough in the industry to have their own opinions and thoughts (Konrad Naborczyk even wrote a post about it some time ago). In this entry, however, I want to give words to other professionals. I asked 10 experts to share their opinion and answer that question. They have different backgrounds and operate in different countries. They are ranging from BIM coordinators, managers, software vendors to salesmen and CEOs. Take a look at what their opinion is about that topic.

Experts and their opinions are ordered in alphabetical order.

The lack of clarity around what BIM is and how it should assist projects

Gavin Crump Gavin Crump
Founder & BIM Consultant at BIM Guru
Australia
YouTube channel
LinkedIN

I think there are many challenges facing BIM and the AEC industry in general, but one of the biggest ones is a lack of clarity around what BIM is and how it ‘should’ (not ‘can’) assist projects/clients.

We’re really only just waking up from more than a decade of ‘BIMwash’ by vendors and their evangelists, and it’s led to quite a muddy tapestry of options and approaches when it comes to the BIM process.

Our industry is naturally siloed, and firms rarely share intellectual property or look towards open source solutions that tend not to sweat the small stuff (e.g. most of them aren’t focused on a masonry hatch, but many firms cannot technically see past these types of things).

This is and will continue to lead to a divide in the types of firms and their understanding and application of BIM as time progresses. As clients become more well versed in what they need and expect of BIM, it will be harder for some firms to keep up or secure larger and more complex projects.

I encourage all firms to look beyond their platforms and focus on how BIM fits as a process in their organisation and its projects, then sculpt their technical approach around this. We’ve been doing the opposite as an industry for far too long now.

The lack of education and national standards

Rui Gavina Rui Gavina
Partner/Digital Practice Manager at VN2R,
Speaker Manager at BILT Committee - Europe
Portugal
LinkedIN
About the biggest challenge, I would say it’s having uneducated requirements and requests from clients and very broad and generic tenders. It’s essentially an issue of education and lack of national standards to point the clients and professionals in the correct direction.

Knowledge, fees, tradition, contracts

Cliff Jordan Clive Jordan
Co-founder at Plannerly
USA
Plannerly website
LinkedIN

I think each team has varying challenges:

  • Owners: knowledge
  • Architects: fees
  • Engineers: tradition
  • Contractors: contracts

We talk too little about what we should stop doing

Ole Kristian Kvarsvik Ole Kristian Kvarsvik
Managing Director at Rendra
Norway
StreamBIM website
LinkedIN

BIM is constantly coming “in addition to”. Even though BIM is used in many of the processes in construction projects, we stick to old routines and processes that comes rather from the document-centre world. The underlying causes are complex, where, among other things, the legal lags behind. Drawings and documents are always the legal basis for deliveries, and “people get good at what they are measured on”. This in turn leads to the data quality in BIM being degraded, which in turn leads to declining confidence in BIM data.

As long as we drive with both a belt and braces, we won’t achieve the productivity growth and gains that lies in digital processes. We must talk about what we have to STOP doing. BIM doesn’t come in addition to – it comes instead of.

Digitization in the AEC industry must not focus on «electrifying paper», it must revolve around a model and data-centric approach in all processes with associated quality requirements.

Evolvement into true interoperability

Aidan Mercer Aidan Mercer
Marketing Director at buildingSMART International
UK
buildingSMART International website
LinkedIN
The biggest challenge for BIM is how it evolves into true interoperability and the enablement of digital twins or dynamic data. BIM processes have worked very effectively for design and coordination and continue to inspire and align the industry, but we are seeing huge digital and process transformation and BIM is no different. We need BIM data to be open and live and available for all phases of the lifecycle. BIM data doesn’t belong in proprietary formats and that’s why I’m so passionate about openBIM. The advent and potential with trends like digital twins require new ways of working and open standards and open data play a key role in its success and I see the extension of BIM very much in this context.

Getting a BIM into the business

Adam Mohammadi Adam Mohammadi
BIM Leader at JM
Sweden
BIM Podden podcast
LinkedIN

The first part applies generally to the broad mass. That they should be able to evaluate the benefits of BIM. Get the BIM into the business. To be able to see the effect of BIM in different work steps on the company, which working methods are most useful.

As an example, what is the benefit of modelling in high detail?
Many people lack knowledge and analysis to concretely see the advantage of modelling in a certain way. They have no idea about the difference between LOD 200 and LOD 400, that analysis does not exist today. Still, the project may be required to be implemented in LOD 400. But no one really knows how LOD 400 will benefit their business. Further examples are Digital Twin, the Client asks to have their project as Digital Twin and pays for it, but in reality, the Property Owner does not really know the benefit of the Digital Twin.

The second part applies to employees who know BIM, the challenge for them is to link BIM with the company’s value chain. The focus with BIM is usually within Design and Production. But it is difficult to create value from the way of working in the early stages or the management of the property. Simply create an uninterrupted flow of information throughout the construction process.

The third part is to reach out to the broad and include the entire sector. In Sweden, for example, we have more than 15,000 companies that are members of the industry organization “Fastighetsägarna” (Swedish: Property Owners), more than 3,500 in the employers’ organization “Byggföretagen” (Construction companies), as well as more than 3,500 in the organization “Installatörsföretagen” (Building Services companies). Skanska, NCC, Peab and JM together account for about 25% of the construction. We must include at least all medium-sized companies, both among Builders and Contractors. Then maybe you can cover 50-60% of the market and then get more power and eventually get everyone involved. But in order to broaden, it is necessary to standardize and ensure that the standards are used and clarify the benefits to a greater extent and make it easy to achieve them.

Myths that disturbs in grasping the essence of BIM

Jurek Rusin Jurek Rusin
Chairman at buildingSMART Poland
CEO/Founder at BIM Point/Multibim
Poland
buildingSMART Poland website
LinkedIN
The biggest challenge is to cope with well-established myths that disturb in grasping the essence of BIM technology – what it is and why using it is necessary. Many of these myths are used as marketing leverage helping to sell different products, such as software (BIM is not software!) or consulting services of questionable quality. Sometimes the myths are spread unconsciously due to the lack of reliable knowledge. Greta Thunberg once said “There are no stupid people, they are just misinformed”, which was of course the lack of awareness of issues related to the climate crisis. However, I think this is a universal principle that can also be applied here. Therefore, I believe that all initiatives leading to the popularization of knowledge resulting from experience, based on proven sources – such as your blog, are very useful and lead us in the right direction.

We need more respect for different involved disciplines and stakeholders

Frode Saltkjelvik Frode Saltkjelvik
CTO at Graphisoft Norway
Norway
Graphisoft Norway website
LinkedIN
One of the biggest challenges around BIM is to make each and every stakeholder understand that this is all about the process and not a specific piece of software. Furthermore, it is important to focus on the need for a minimum of knowledge both in the processes surrounding what BIM entails, but also in one’s own and others’ software that is used. We need more respect for different actors involved and that these have their own needs that may be better covered by software that is specially adapted for their use. The understanding that we have to adhere to open standards and that this actually provides added value for everyone involved is a challenge. Some people blame the IFC format for problems they experience, but if you investigate a little, it is rather limitations of your own software that are the cause. We have to become better at demanding from software vendors that things work as they should because if the problem is nonexistent in other software, it must also be solvable in the one they deliver.

The transition from traditional project planning to BIM project planning

Roberto Schiera Roberto Schiera
Area Sales Representative DACH at dRofus
Germany
dRofus website
LinkedIN
The biggest challenges I’ve met were related to the transition from traditional project planning to BIM Project planning. Basically, it´s difficult to convince professionals (who maybe have been working with their consolidated routines for the last 20 years) that BIM is more efficient, given the difficulties in the implementation phase. Then, of course, we have the challenge of merging all disciplines in an efficient way. Although this is now easier with BIM than with “the good old way”, the need for a well-done preparation (aka BIM Execution Plan) is really crucial.

The lack of digitally literate individuals

Vasshaug Håvard Vasshaug
Director at Reope
Norway
Reope website
LinkedIN

From my point of view, the biggest challenge for the industry is the lack of digitally literate individuals working in it. So many people talk about digitization but very few people in the industry can make any digital tools. We need more people who actually work in the industry to create and own digital tools and processes and outsource less to the IT industry. This is also the biggest challenge for BIM. 🙂

A question for you

You have read many points of view. Do you agree with them, or do you stand in contrast to some (or all) of them? What is your opinion on the biggest challenges before BIM? Share it in the comment section below. I will choose some of the best and paste them into the main article. People will come and read them until all those challenges become merely a distant memory. 😉

Did you like that post ? Share it with others !

We spend a lot of time and effort creating all of our articles and guides. It would be great if you could take a moment to share this post !

Share:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Comments:

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Victor Munoz
Victor Munoz
2 months ago

I agree with all opinions, but I think there is a problem with the meaning of BIM, please don´t misunderstand me, but I really think that BIM is software or technology instead of a process. Why do I believe that? If you see other industries, they already had this problem about adopting new tools/software and they solved with the concept of digital transformation (DX).

What is digital transformation (DX)? it is not about using new software, it is a changing process lead by digital data. Then there is 6 axis to take care of such as processes, organisation, culture, strategy, customers/partners and technology.

Other people think of BIM as a Lean tool to give a framework in which this tool works more than as software.

But if you really understand the concept of DX, BIM will become just a software lead by each axis. If you don’t take care of each axis “your BIM” will become just software in the same way as other industries think of DX as adopting new software.

Xqwewsq
Xqwewsq
2 months ago
Reply to  Victor Munoz

I think you are right Victor, but you think it is a technology because it is linked to this technologies. We could say that BIM will really be here after the DX.
Is BIM an idea produced by the software? Who cares.

Igor Svetel
Igor Svetel
2 months ago
Reply to  Victor Munoz

We can compare BIM with successful digital transformations.

Is the digital photography the camera, sensor and lens?

Or is it a software for image processing?

Neither of those.

First, you are taking a photo using a knowledge of your camera, sensor and lens to get best photo in particular situation like in traditional photography. Than you compare what you get, on the camera screen, with the scene and see instantly how deficiency of digital sensor impacts your photo. Than you recall how you can process photo in software to make it better, so you take another shot that better suits processing requirements. And then you think, and get new idea, and take new shot… Finally you opens your shots in some software and gets new ideas how to process them.

So, digital photography is completely new process that includes both camera and software, and most important, knowledge about all aspects of digital process to achieve best results.

When we achieve this level in BIM, we will have successful digital transformation in AEC.

Author:

Download BIM Salary report:

  • BIM specialists’ salaries from 24 countries from around the world,
  • Information about the maturity of BIM adoption in each of these countries,
  • List of websites where you can find BIM job in a given country. 
BIM Salary Report

Newest articles: